Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
krakensden
on Dec 16, 2009
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
'We are no longer as optimistic about removing the...
Don't the in-memory databases generally run in another process (memcached) anyway?
(Not that your general point is wrong)
fauigerzigerk
on Dec 16, 2009
|
next
[–]
Yes but if I'm the one writing in memory database/analytics stuff I might want to use a Python/C combination to do that. Right now that's not an option because of the GIL issue.
old-gregg
on Dec 16, 2009
|
prev
[–]
But don't you want your in-memory database to be non-locking, i.e. serving many clients simultaneously and fast?
krakensden
on Dec 19, 2009
|
parent
[–]
The point was your in-memory database is an external, non-python program, and you run lots of python clients.
The way most web applications are structured, for instance.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
(Not that your general point is wrong)