> No, it wouldn't. DRM means someone other than the hardware owner restricts what the hardware can do.
Why doesn't it include someone voluntarily giving up what the hardware can do?
> Now as the server owner, you can remotely verify it's still running the software you specified. But without that third party role, you can't prove this to anyone else!
Why couldn't the license holder of the software take this role?
Why doesn't it include someone voluntarily giving up what the hardware can do?
> Now as the server owner, you can remotely verify it's still running the software you specified. But without that third party role, you can't prove this to anyone else!
Why couldn't the license holder of the software take this role?