Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>immune to prosecution for official acts.

nope not true at all. go away troll

 help



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States

> Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court determined that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that Congress cannot regulate such as the pardon, command of the military, execution of laws, or control of the executive branch

Seems accurate.


“Seems accurate” isn’t accurate CJ.

1. Immunity for core constitutional powers

2. Presumptive immunity for official acts.

3. No difference from anyone else for non-official acts


It is accurate.

You quoted:

> immune to prosecution for official acts

That describes all three of your counts just fine. A little broadly, but it’s correct.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: