After all nothing is more trustworthy than statistics. They should never be conflated with lies or damned lies.
Why would these be in conflict unless you take your personal experience and draw a conclusion beyond that?
>After all nothing is more trustworthy than statistics. They should never be conflated with lies or damned lies.
Why can't I trust statistics if they are sometimes lies?
You shouldn't trust your perception, and shouldn't trust statistics. You should question both.
My personal perception can be right as well as statistics the issue is when I use my own limited experience to generalize.
After all nothing is more trustworthy than statistics. They should never be conflated with lies or damned lies.