Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I can’t tell what your argument is here.

BG3 does feature an incest sex scene. You can fuck the drow twins.

Are you saying that BG3 should be ok because it’s a good game? Or BG3 is only ok because it doesn’t show much of the incest sex?



They're saying that if things have come to the point that activists can successfully pressure a AAA title like BG3 to be delisted from steam, then they'll worry.

What do BG3 and the title in question have in common? "incest" (though, not non-con, I don't think BG3 has such)

What does BG3 have that the other title doesn't? Critical acclaim and the support of the mainstream. THis is the same issue with GOT.

Why does BH3 have critical acclaim and mainstream support and the other title doesn't? Is this a difficult topic to grasp?


The argument seems centered on content though.

BG3 is fairly tame. Outlast trials has you mutilate genitals and has people threatening to rape you frequently.


If you think they should delist it then by all means, raise a petition or bring it to their attention. Perhaps the activist group simply has not had the resources to target this particular title yet.

You already know VISA and/or Mastercard will respond if an activist group raises enough of a concern so what's stopping you?

Ah right, you think if they got one game removed on a petition, they should somehow also be able to remove every single other game that may or may not meet the same criteria even though it probably took them significant effort to the the first game removed and this is some sort of "gotcha" on their moral inconsistency rather than a simple limitation of resources to try to get their will done all at once?


Mouthwashing just got delisted


I’m saying precedent is concerning




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: