Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This seems like a superficial dive. JQM has a ton of things Bootstrap doesn't, like separate pages based around div tags, hierarchical navigation and app-like transitions between those pages.

Not disagreeing with most of the points raised, but I don't think its the full story.



I get a lot of questions about how I did page routing and page transitions when I transitioned. I ended up writing just a few lines of JQM-inspired page changing code - since it's a PhoneGap app, I didn't need to worry about changing the URL properly - just changing DIV visibility and some event triggering. When I was using jQM, I had disabled transitions, so I didn't go through any effort in re-implementing those in Bootstrap.

But, yeah, if you're really keen on that stuff, then my choice may not be the one for you.


Exactly - these are two different tools with two different purposes. Glad he could opt for the TBS responsive stuff in this case but it's misleading in general.


:%s/he/she :)


got the same feeling. plus bootstrap actually makes use of jquery.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: