Am I understanding correctly, and the only thing with a bit of actual data released so far is the ARC-AGI piece from Francois Chollet? And every other claim has no further data released on it?
Serious question. I've browsed around, looked for the official release, but it seems to be just hear-say for now, except for the few little bits in the ARC-AGI article.
So some of the reactions seems quite far-fetched. I was quite amazed at first seeing the benchmarks, but then actually read the ARC-AGI article and a few other things about how it worked, learned a bit more about the different benchmarks, and realised we've no proper idea yet how o3 is working under the hood, the thing isn't even realeased.
It could be doing the same thing that chess-engines do except in several specific domains. Which would be very cool, but not necessarily "intelligent" or "generally intelligent" in any sense whatsoever! Will that kind of model lead to finding novel mathematical proofs, or actually "reasoning" or "thinking" in any way similar to a human, remains entirely uncertain.
Serious question. I've browsed around, looked for the official release, but it seems to be just hear-say for now, except for the few little bits in the ARC-AGI article.
So some of the reactions seems quite far-fetched. I was quite amazed at first seeing the benchmarks, but then actually read the ARC-AGI article and a few other things about how it worked, learned a bit more about the different benchmarks, and realised we've no proper idea yet how o3 is working under the hood, the thing isn't even realeased.
It could be doing the same thing that chess-engines do except in several specific domains. Which would be very cool, but not necessarily "intelligent" or "generally intelligent" in any sense whatsoever! Will that kind of model lead to finding novel mathematical proofs, or actually "reasoning" or "thinking" in any way similar to a human, remains entirely uncertain.