Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is it? How?

You could include a lot of little bells far from the single mode, but that's reading a little too much into the literal meaning of "single mode" - a "bimodal" distribution isn't one where the two most common values are both modes. It's one where there are two distinct local maxima.

The tails to the left and right must asymptotically approach zero (or you don't have a smooth distribution, because you have discontinuities somewhere), and if there's just one local maximum, your curve will look like a bell.



The exponential distribution (modal value 0) is not bell shaped. If you don't like it's range of non-negative, then take some smooth mollification


Yes or the chi-square distribution with k=1 or 2 or any other of the gamma distributions[1] with the right parameters will have a shape that is one-sided with the mode at the lower extreme and no "low tail" in the normal sense.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_distribution or https://stats.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Probability_Theory/...


And the smooth mollification will look like...?


in the simplest case... just mirror it (some call this a Laplace distribution). if you don't like how it's not differentiable at the mode there are further smoothings (see, e.g., the wikipedia article for this distribution) but this simple construction is continuous.


It looks like a spike, not a bell.


A spike is not smooth (typically meaning continuous in the variable and its first derivative), which was one of the conditions.


Then take a Cauchy or a t-distribution. Basically anything with a longer tail than exp(x^2). The Gaussian summary will be misleading because of the tails.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: