> It's not mystical nonsense, it's a logical consequence of the mathematics of quantum mechanics.
Aren't the various interpretations of QM all empirically indistinguishable from within the universe, which is why they are interpretations and not, say, hypotheses?
It turns out that all of the various interpretations are more or less equivalent, with the exception of the various collapse theories, which are empirically testable and have so far all been falsified.
Aren't the various interpretations of QM all empirically indistinguishable from within the universe, which is why they are interpretations and not, say, hypotheses?