Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So from all the news it's difficult to figure out what might have been the boards Idea. But I have a fealing it went something like this:

Adam D'Angelo has a solution for selling chatbots using ChatGPT(Poe). He asks Sam "is OpenAI working on anything similar" and Sam goes, sure, but it's not far along, talk to A about it. A says "yea, we never got far with it.". Time passes and OpenAI releases a product that blows Adams offering completely out of the water, and he goes "WTF A said we never got far!?!?" Sam goes Oh, this is a solution by B.

So now Adams pissed, and the board probably agrees that Sam lied by omission and that he willfully fucked Adam over, so they have a vote, and kick him out thinking that the public is going to go "Oh yea, they did the right thing kicking him out for lying"... except they can't say he lied, because he didn't. So they send the cryptic reason of him “not being consistently candid in his communications”. Of cause they didn't clear any of this with anyone and just thought they had the seat of power in the situation because "they are the board". Now they imploded the company in an attempt to give Adam some justice for Sam blowing up his project. But nothing can officially be said, because it all comes of as unprofessional and just straight up stupid. They can't punish Sam for persuing a bot store, because that's good for OpenAI and Adams on the board representing OpenAI, not his other projects. They can't go out and argue that Sam lies because he didn't. They can't argue that it's a firerable offense to have two teams working on the same thing. And they can't just stick to their decision because that has 90% of the company jumping ship and continuing under a new Microsoft Banner.

All of this is complete speculation trying to align the tidbits of facts that have been presented here and there, but all I can say is I can't wait for the Movie to come out.



Sounds like he was a hair’s breadth away from a conflict of interest.

No matter the weight the Poe<>CustomGPT overlap has on today’s overall situation, it was certainly inviting trouble.

Seems like a properly-run board wouldn’t have allowed such clear conflicts of interest to last a moment.


Too late to edit, but I think Adam D'Angelo staying on the board proves my speculation completely wrong.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: