> "In 1969, Minsky and Seymour Papert published “Perceptrons,” a book that assailed Rosenblatt’s work and, essentially, sealed its fate. The following year, Minsky won the A.M. Turing Award - computing’s highest honor."
I don't understand how explaining the limitations of a single perceptron would be relevant. To use an imperfect analogy, it would be like if you explained the limitations of a single transistor as a way to assail a microprocessor research program. Maybe you will say it's hindsight but this criticism never made sense to me. I have to imagine Minsky had some powerful charisma to pull this off.
I don't understand how explaining the limitations of a single perceptron would be relevant. To use an imperfect analogy, it would be like if you explained the limitations of a single transistor as a way to assail a microprocessor research program. Maybe you will say it's hindsight but this criticism never made sense to me. I have to imagine Minsky had some powerful charisma to pull this off.