Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm surprised anyone doesn't get value from them. I query GPT-4 regularly, and it rarely disappoints.

It's decent at coding and excellent at troubleshooting.

I've never seen it make a grammatical, syntactic or spelling error. With good context, it can write anything you want.

You need to have experimented with it a bit to know how to reliably prompt it, but once you get a feel for it the tool is invaluable.



I didn't mean to be rude or anything like that. You are probably right, seeing all these positive opinions, there must be value in there.

I'm just amazed by the reactions on this post. From the HN crowd I was, wongly, expecting very different opinions.

For coding, are you using it like a pairing with a junior developer or more like a search engine for documentation?


I use it with the documentation of what I'm building.

Paste in the relevant section of the developer docs, ask it to write a function, or ask it to produce a valid API request, etc.

I suppose it's like a junior dev in a sense but it's very fast, can correct its own mistakes if you point them out, and has an internet worth of knowledge about various approaches and troubleshooting techniques.

I find most people who don't see value haven't actually used GPT-4 yet. Have you?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: