> I think the state of the art for all this is still pretty far away, which is why the instinct is to assume we're talking about something specialized.
Yes, that's exactly what I thought. If we are talking about AGI + human level robotic dexterity, then the use of "simply" becomes even funnier.
Yes, that's exactly what I thought. If we are talking about AGI + human level robotic dexterity, then the use of "simply" becomes even funnier.