Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sure! Here you go for the RAW file : http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=04290873673274490201

Here is the SOOC JPG for the same image : http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=88911356095628235668

Google Chrome might warn you of the risk for malware, but it seems to do for every good, free filehost :/

For reference, here is the screenshot : https://imgur.com/a/6RkiGyH

It doesn't do this for every photo either, which is even more baffling.

I hope you'll excuse the poor composition, but I didn't want to publish a photo I might put on an account with my name on it :)



https://imgur.com/a/0Pj2lex

Weird. I just did +1EV exposure and filmic rgb as is recommended, and it looks just fine to me.

What version of darktable are you using?


I tried two versions, 3.3.0+185, and 3.2.1-1, one through pacman and the other compiled from source.


That's really wacky. do you also have the sidecar file? May be a bug.


Yup, here is the sidecar file: https://x0.at/uSx.xmp

I think it might be a bug too. Which is too bad, because Darktable is soooo close to the perfect photo editor (except for CA correction and sharpening, but that's neither here nor there)


Just saw this. I'll take a look after work :D


Thanks!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: