> Take a look at this image and tell me it’s immediately intuitive
I'm using Git, there's nothing intuitive to be found here.
On a possibly related note, I watched a talk by D. Richard Hipp (I don't remember which one - edit: probably "Richard Hipp - Git: Just Say No"[1]) where he compared it with Git (a lot) and explained how Fossil keeps everything, there's no throwing away of history, no need for rebasing (at least as a workflow). It sounded nice - refreshing, even. I'm going to start using it for some projects and see how I get on, because frankly, I'm tired of Git and this need to strategise saving copies of my work, because that's basically what it does.
Sometimes I even pine for the days I used to version zip files…
I'm using Git, there's nothing intuitive to be found here.
On a possibly related note, I watched a talk by D. Richard Hipp (I don't remember which one - edit: probably "Richard Hipp - Git: Just Say No"[1]) where he compared it with Git (a lot) and explained how Fossil keeps everything, there's no throwing away of history, no need for rebasing (at least as a workflow). It sounded nice - refreshing, even. I'm going to start using it for some projects and see how I get on, because frankly, I'm tired of Git and this need to strategise saving copies of my work, because that's basically what it does.
Sometimes I even pine for the days I used to version zip files…
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghtpJnrdgbo