> No, that's what it was for, and still is for, for the 18-25 crowd. When the older crowd started using it, their interest was different.
That's an assumption you're presenting as if it's a fact.
> No, it was the 25+ and especially 30+ crowd flooding onto it that changed things.
Again, an assumption. I'm not wrong in what I said.
> I have no idea what you're complaining about here.
I'm not complaining about anything. What I'm saying is that for every man or woman you see complaining about things in profile photos, there's another man or woman that loves it. I've seen plenty of female profiles on Tinder complaining about pics of guys with animals.
That's one of the things about online dating, though - people are clearly having different experiences. Neither of us are wrong.
No, anyone who generalizes Tinder across all age ranges is wrong. That's what I'm pointing out. I've never seen any woman complain about guys having pics of animals. But if you've seen that, and you're looking at women aged 18-25, then of course you're going to have a different experience than me, because I don't look at those women. And you're not going to see the same things as me if you're not looking at 35-40yo women. What 18-25yo women do or like is completely irrelevant to me, as what 35-40yo women do or like should be completely irrelevant to you.
That's an assumption you're presenting as if it's a fact.
> No, it was the 25+ and especially 30+ crowd flooding onto it that changed things.
Again, an assumption. I'm not wrong in what I said.
> I have no idea what you're complaining about here.
I'm not complaining about anything. What I'm saying is that for every man or woman you see complaining about things in profile photos, there's another man or woman that loves it. I've seen plenty of female profiles on Tinder complaining about pics of guys with animals.
That's one of the things about online dating, though - people are clearly having different experiences. Neither of us are wrong.