i internalised it as the regular plural of stigma, so i'm guessing i've seen it ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		zem on April 11, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Online Dating and the Death of the 'Mixed-Attracti... i internalised it as the regular plural of stigma, so i'm guessing i've seen it in books. here's a 2010 Google books result from googling "societal stigmata". https://books.google.com/books?id=xXTcQ-TyK6MC&pg=PA947&lpg=...

jnbiche on April 11, 2016 [–]

OK, well done. I'm surprised it's still used by some writers in this manner, and it's very rare. It's definitely not the regular plural of "stigma".

Still, I was wrong.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact