I read a lot of the citations quoted by this guy and they seem to be saying different things than he does.
For example he says that fish oil has toxic effects on the liver and cites Ritskes-Hoitinga, et al., 1998. The actual paper says that fish oil may have hepatoxic effects in herbivorous animals and that therefor when using herbivorous animals to study the effects of fish oil on atherogenesis, the effects on these animals livers may need to be excluded (because it's not observed in other animals).
For example he says that fish oil has toxic effects on the liver and cites Ritskes-Hoitinga, et al., 1998. The actual paper says that fish oil may have hepatoxic effects in herbivorous animals and that therefor when using herbivorous animals to study the effects of fish oil on atherogenesis, the effects on these animals livers may need to be excluded (because it's not observed in other animals).