Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | exikyut's commentslogin

Devbox seems to be semi-public, and/or offered to customers: https://devbox.microsoft.com/

Curious if there's a way random people can test it.


This is basically the same as having an automated way to provision Azure VM instances that you would access via RDP, already quite common in many IT organisations, especially for temporary team members as contractors.

I'll bite; ok, what'd you do? :)



I wonder what that group of people would have made of https://youtu.be/zy_ctHNLan8

(Chaotic lawfully :D)



I wonder what happened to the building when us-east-1 went down.


As the parent said: “Everyone was locked out in a building am staying at (40 something stories) for several hours.”


Now I am waiting for time when they move us-east-1 physical security to run in us-east-1... Thus locking themselves out when needing some physical intervention on servers to get backup.


Facebook already got bit by this when their BGP setup pooped its pants on Oct 4, 2021



This is in SEA. They probably operate from ap-southeast-1 or 2. But yeah, if the internet goes down, the provider service goes down or AWS goes down they are cooked.


I wonder what happened to the building when the internet went down. How do you get into the room to reboot the router?


There’s usually a back door with a physical key. The problem can be getting ahold of one of the people with that key though!


There is probably a break-glass procedure for such cases, like, break the literal window.


A lot of modern glass is hard to break. In many cases this is a safety feature (if you can't break the glass you can't get shoved out the window in a fight...)


Is that why there is a brick next to the procedure manual?


That’s the emergency escape brick.


At the moment there's a [dead] subling comment by the project author explaining what it's about. Because the comment is dead I can't reply to it asking further questions unfortunately.

The project was apparently designed and created on a phone.


I vouched for it and encouraged others to do the same. It doesn't appear to have been flagged and a provides a detailed rationale for the project, even though I share the doubts about the overall utility.


I'm curious: what does MUC stand for? :)


What's this in reference to? Sounds mildly interesting


They forked the open source project. ACF was forked as SCF.


This was posted only a month ago: https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the-secret-history-of-tor... (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44838378)

The article provides a good foundation for opposing arguments.

Excerpting:

> The researchers wanted to find a way to do the seemingly impossible — to give the military the benefits of a global, high-speed communications network without exposing them to the vulnerabilities of the metadata that the network relied on to operate.

> ...

> There are other implications, as well. For a CIA agent to use Tor without suspicion in non-U.S. nations, for example, there would need to be plenty of citizens in these nations using Tor for everyday internet browsing. Similarly, if the only users in a particular country are whistleblowers, civil rights activists and protesters, the government may well simply arrest anyone connecting to your anonymity network. As a result, an onion routing system had to be open to as wide a range of users and maintainers as possible, so that the mere fact that someone was using the system wouldn’t reveal anything about their identity or their affiliations.

> ...

> Anonymity loves company — so Tor needed to be sold to the general public. That necessity led to an unlikely alliance between cypherpunks and the U.S. Navy.

> The NRL researchers behind Onion routing knew it wouldn’t work unless everyday people used it, so they reached out to the cypherpunks and invited them into conversations about design and strategy to reach the masses.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: