Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cced's commentslogin

So they renamed performance to mean efficiency and are now using super in place of performance?

Super is old "performance" core:

> The industry-leading super core was first introduced as performance cores in M5, which also adopts the super core name for all M5-based products

But new "performance" is claimed to be new design (= not just overclocked efficiency core from M5?):

> M5 Pro and M5 Max also introduce an all-new performance core that is optimized to deliver greater power-efficient, multithreaded performance for pro workloads.

quotes from https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/03/apple-debuts-m5-pro-a...


> We attacked them

During negotiations, for the second time.


Negotiations during which the Iranians continuously stalled and continued their nuclear work. The threat of attack was part of the US negotiation strategy, and the Iranians thought they would call the "bluff". They were wrong.

Gentiles have a right to defend themselves.

Which is exactly why I expect the Americans to destroy the nuclear capability of the state that regularly chants "Death to America".

Did they chant that before or after hamas beheaded 40 babies? I lose track of all the lies.

[flagged]


They have been chanting "down with America" - that does not mean "murder every single person in America with their missiles (which can't reach America)"

"Death to" is a mistranslation of "marg bar", a phrase that is also applied to traffic, and inflation.

Do the Iranians want to kill all traffic and all... inflation?

We no longer believe your lies.


I'm grant you that I do not speak Persian, but I do speak Arabic and Hebrew. In Arabic the phrase موت لامريكا is common enough. And this Hebrew sign in Tehran says "prepare your coffins":

https://www.alamy.com/an-anti-israeli-mural-showing-a-launch...

So I do appreciate you educating me on the literal meaning of the Persian phrase, yet I dispute your interpretation that they state no intention of murdering us. Quite the opposite, the more I research it the more Hebrew banners in Tehran I see and I can conclude not only are they capable of murdering myself and my children, they have intent as well.


Imo those web apps are all infrastructure services: logistic network, content library access, and hardware access.


Yeah. Exactly. Most of the stuff you pay for is. Hardly anything is pure app without some kind of value external to the software.


> > Stage Restrictions: Only age-assured adults may speak on stage in servers.

Does this mean that in panel-like settings where 100s of users are listening to a speaker, in order to ask or contribute in voice you need to be verified?


I guess so, since the same role is used for anyone with permission to speak up in a stage channel.

https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500005513722-...

Hell if I know why unverified users are allowed to speak in normal voice channels but not in stage channels.


Competitors use ads?


I'm "excited" for the era of different locally run LLMs get to have ads baked into them... People start selling ad-space to inject into their training/tuning data. Could be quite lucrative.


Not yet. But they likely will, if OpenAI's ad revenue becomes worthwhile.


Or they view it as a differentiator and focus on a different segment. As I understand it, this is what Anthropic is doing:

1. Focus on businesses and developers

2. Make money on productivity and API platform

Enterprises are particularly sensitive about their data being farmed (e.g. note that paid Google accounts don’t have their emails used for ads.)

Keeping that trust is not a differentiator and existentially important to Anthropic.


I just don't believe that is likely.

I think that, despite Anthropic's present statements, they will move to ads if ads prove successful for ChatGPT or Gemini.

It would be viewed as "leaving money on the table" by their board and shareholders if they didn't.


this is false and not how things work at the enterprise level. trust is important and it is not lost by showing ads in free tier.

trust is lost in other ways.


no they don't


They will or they will perform worse. OpenAI will be able to offer a better `free tier` as it won't be free after all.


Not yet, but they all will. OpenAI has shown that customers will accept it.


name a single product that has

1. many competitors

2. ways to pay for the subscription but no tier exists to remove ads

i can't even think of one.


Ever heard of a thing called television?


Netflix


Netflix does not replace television channels, except when it actually partners with TV broadcasters. Netflix only replaces how you consume series and films. Many TV programs --news, short series, specials, local/regional programs, etc-- aren't available at all on Netflix, or when they are they only become available months/years later due to licensing.


Which security bug(s) are you referring to?


Presumably bugs that may still be under embargo


> You can tax the worker and she will still be better off than if you had taxed the capital, due to greater productivity.

This assumes the worker is the one benefiting from the productivity gains. We're just worked more and we don't get the added value.


Yeah but even there, how do you get dynamic routes for static builds?


We didn't decided that–they did.


The more I see these types of things the more my skepticism shoots up when someone tells me something is perfectly safe.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: